Richard And Samuel Banner Trust
Charity 218649
Overview
Summary
Richard And Samuel Banner Trust appears to be a place-based individual grant-maker with a deliberately dual role: responding to hardship among city residents while supporting educational opportunity for younger people in need. Its objects suggest that immediate financial distress and longer-term prospects are treated as connected concerns rather than separate missions. The available evidence indicates a focused, distributive model rather than direct service delivery, but provides little visibility of grant scale, referral routes, or the specific city and communities reached.
Operational geography
Coverage: Citywide
Operational areas:
Evidence and reasoning
Supporting evidence
Remaining uncertainties
- The Charity Commission record identifies Birmingham City as the charity's area of operation, but does not identify grant recipients, delivery locations or activity by ward.
- No operational premises are evidenced. The Birmingham address is stated as care of Veale Wasbrough Vizards and should be treated as a correspondence address rather than a service site.
- No current partner organisations or funded delivery organisations were identified from the available evidence, so it is not possible to assess whether partnerships extend the trust's operational reach.
- The available evidence supports citywide eligibility for individual grants within Birmingham, but does not show whether grants are distributed evenly across the city or concentrated in particular neighbourhoods.
Additional evidence needed
- A current grants policy, application guidance or annual grant summary showing eligibility boundaries and the locations of awards.
- An anonymised recent grants register or trustee report showing the geographic distribution of awards.
- Confirmation from the trust of whether it operates any public-facing, administrative or delivery premises in Birmingham.
- Details of any current referral partners, schools, advice agencies or community organisations involved in identifying or supporting beneficiaries.
Areas of work
- Education/training
- The Prevention Or Relief Of Poverty
Who they help
- Children/young People
- Elderly/old People
How they help
- Makes Grants To Individuals
Discoveries involving this organisation
The Atlas has not published any Discoveries involving this organisation yet.
Observations
A deliberate balance between crisis relief and future opportunity
The trust appears to divide its annual income between relieving need and promoting education for under-25s in need. This may indicate an intentional balance between addressing present hardship and improving longer-term life chances.
Why it matters
This helps distinguish the trust from a purely emergency-relief fund or a conventional education charity. Its role may be to connect immediate support with social mobility within the same locality.
Show evidence
“Yearly income is split into two parts: relief in need for city residents in need, hardship or distress, and promotion of education for persons under 25 resident in the city who are in need.”
Source:Charity Commission“The charity's purposes include education/training and the prevention or relief of poverty.”
Source:Charity Commission
Its intervention point is the individual, not the service system
By making grants to individuals, the trust appears positioned to provide direct, flexible assistance rather than operate programmes or fund organisations.
Why it matters
This suggests the trust may fill gaps that institutional services or larger charities do not readily meet, especially where a person's need is specific, urgent or unsuitable for standard provision.
Show evidence
“The charity makes grants to individuals.”
Source:Charity Commission“Its activities include relief of poverty.”
Source:Charity Commission
A geographically bounded but age-spanning local safety net
The trust's remit is confined to residents of a city, while its declared beneficiaries include young people and older people. It may therefore occupy a locally rooted role across different stages of life, with education specifically focused on younger residents.
Why it matters
This raises useful questions about whether the trust reaches groups whose needs are often addressed separately, and whether it has relationships with local schools, welfare advisers, or organisations supporting older residents.
Show evidence
“The objects refer to persons resident in the city.”
Source:Charity Commission“The charity helps children/young people and elderly/old people.”
Source:Charity Commission
- Which city defines the trust's area of benefit.
- How income is divided between hardship relief and education.
- Whether grants are accessed directly, through referrals, or via partner organisations.
- Which needs, age groups and communities receive grants in practice.
Remaining uncertainties
- Recent annual reports or grant records showing grant numbers, values, purposes and beneficiary patterns.
- Grant application guidance, eligibility criteria and any referral or partnership arrangements.
- Information on the geographic area served and how the trust identifies unmet local need.
Additional evidence needed
Charity Commission profile
Activities
Relief of poverty
Charity objects
YEARLY INCOME SPLIT INTO TWO PARTS. PART 1 - RELIEF IN NEED OF PERSONS RESIDENT IN CITY WHO ARE IN NEED, HARDSHIP OR DISTRESS. PART 2 - PROMOTION OF EDUCATION, INCOME APPLIED IN THE PROMOTION OF EDUCATION OF PERSONS UNDER 25 RESIDENT IN THE CITY WHO ARE IN NEED